Roads Were Not Built For Cars

American and British cyclists of the 1890s saved roads for ALL users

  • Book info
  • Clicky-flicky book preview
  • iPad book preview
  • Twitter
Roads Were Not Built For Cars

Automotive history

Archive

May 3, 2013 by carltonreid

US senator: “[Automobiles are the future but] I cannot conceive our active Americans in carriages moved by any other motor but the horse”


Send to Kindle

371px-CMDepew“I imagine that one fine morning we shall wake up with apparatus ready to take us to our offices by an automobile carriage…But…I cannot conceive our active Americans adapting themselves to the pursuit of pleasure in carriages moved…by any other motor but the horse. What has made the bicycle so universally popular but the one fact that it permits of action on the part of the rider, that it affords excitement?”

Chauncey Mitchell Depew
US senator, 1899 to 1911
Quoted in ‘The Horseless Age’ by Henry W. Fischer, Munsey’s Magazine, May 1895.

Posted in 1890s, Automotive history · Leave a Reply ·

Archive

April 11, 2013 by carltonreid

Road users should “take care owing to the children who make the road their playground”

Send to Kindle

CTCBritishRoadBook1897Arthur T. Poyser of the Cyclists’ Touring Club wrote a series of itinerary-style touring books for the organisation he worked for. The British Road Book, produced in 1897, came in five volumes, covering the whole of Great Britain. Scotland was covered in volume four and there’s an instructive passage on the route between Stirling and Perth.

Poyser wrote this was “a very good main road, well-made throughout, and possessing on the whole a capital surface…”

The entry continued:

“There is a long descent through Auchterarder, becoming rather steep latterly, and requiring care owing to the children who make the road their playground…”

Cyclists – then and now – tend to be more cognisant of the risks of collision because in any impact, even in cases of impacting soft things such as small children, they are just as likely to injure themselves as cause harm to the soft thing they hit.

Compare and contrast this with the attitude of some motorists, then and now. Solid things are to be avoided at all costs but soft things pose little danger to the motorist.

This is illustrated by the infamous quote from Lieut-Colonel J.T.C. Moore-Brabazon, vice-chair of the Automobile Club and a motorist and a racing car driver from 1903 onwards. (In 1940 he was appointed Minister of Transport). His views, given to parliament in 1934, on how everything and everybody should get out of the way of cars, is chilling:

“It is true that 7000 people are killed in motor accidents, but it is not always going on like that. People are getting used to the new conditions… No doubt many of the old Members of the House will recollect the number of chickens we killed in the old days. We used to come back with the radiator stuffed with feathers. It was the same with dogs. Dogs get out of the way of motor cars nowadays and you never kill one. There is education even in the lower animals. These things will right themselves.”

And here’s a photo of a London driving school in 1905. The dog and chicken figures look to be on a movable track and were possibly more potentially damaging to the car than the real thing so very much to be avoided.

Notting Hill

There will be much more about driver attitudes to other road users in the book, the Kickstarter campaign for which has another nine days to run.

Posted in 1890s, Automotive history, CTC history · 2 Replies ·

Archive

March 25, 2013 by carltonreid

Motorists and cyclists are not two tribes, historically they’re from the same tribe

Send to Kindle

AA President Edmund King is hot on dispelling the myth that motorists and cyclists come from different planets. In a ‘Two Tribes’ presentation given to a road safety conference he said: “We really must get past this dangerous ‘them and us’ mentality that sours interactions between different groups.” And on Twitter he tries to reduce the animosity shown to cyclists by motorists, and vice versa. The fact remains that – for some motorists, and for some cyclists – never the twain shall meet. Yet, historically, cyclists and motorists have far more in common than many may imagine, a theme I will explore in Roads Were Not Built For Cars, the Kickstarter campaign for which is still taking pledges.

Stanley Show of Cycles, 1896. Cycles, and horseless carriages, too. 12 of them. Two had been displayed at the 1895 Stanley Show, the first time the British public were shown these new contraptions.

Stanley Show of Cycles, 1896. Cycles, and horseless carriages, too. 12 of them. Two had been displayed at the 1895 Stanley Show, the first time the British public were shown these new contraptions.

It’s usually assumed – and, thanks to some automotive historians, often explicitly written – that motorcars evolved directly from horse-drawn carriages. This is not so. In fact, if a paternity test were possible, it could be strongly argued that motorcars have more bicycle DNA in them than carriage DNA. Extending the metaphor, the automotive industry grew from seeds planted in the fertile soil that was the late 19th century bicycle market. The early motorists – especially the ones who raced for a living – tended to have been cyclists before they were seduced by the greater speed and power of motoring. The first car purchasers were rich and posh, and many would know how to mount and steer their new motorcars because the first motorcars were very much like the tricycles they had only recently given up. A member’s list for the 1904 Automobile Club of Great Britain and Ireland shows that many of the members were proud to display their love for cycling and committee members were officials of cycling organisations, too (E. R. Shipton was editor of the Cyclists’ Touring Club Gazette; Henry Sturmey – who gave his name to Sturmey Archer gears – was also a cycling journalist: wrote a classic 1877 book on cycling and also founded a motoring magazine). The first automobile manufacturers tended to be cyclists: from Henry Ford to Charles Duryea in the US, and Charles Rolls and Lionel Martin in the UK (Rolls Royce and Aston Martin were both co-founded by cyclists). Many of the first car parts were bike parts: the first motorcar wheels were heavy-duty spoked bicycle wheels, and they were later shod with that great cycling innovation, pneumatic tyres.

MOTORING’S DEEP LINKS WITH CYCLING
1885BenzThere were many motorised road-going machines before the birth of the motorcar – mostly steam-engines of one form or another – but the first true car was the one developed by Karl Benz in Germany. Benz was a cyclist and went into business with cyclists. In 1883, he co-founded a gas engine business with Max Rose and Friedrich Wilhelm Eßlinger, owners of a bicycle repair shop. Benz & Cie flourished and enabled Benz to experiment with bicycle technology to create his first motor vehicles. Unlike the horse carriages of the day, which used wooden spoked wheels, Benz used wire spoked bicycle wheels for his first Motorwagen. He also used the same differential gears and chains used on the bicycles of the day. The first true motorcar was a tricycle with a motor, and shared no DNA with horse carriages.

The second customer for Benz’s third design – the first commercially available automobile in history – was Emile Roger, a Parisian bicycle manufacturer. In the UK, the Benz Motorwagen was promoted as a “motor velocipede” not a motor carriage.

jkStarleyElectricCar1888John Kemp Starley, originator of the Rover safety bicycle (Land Rover cars were developed by the company created by JK Starley), is one of Britain’s most unsung engineers. As well as developing the bicycle that “set the fashion to the world”, JK worked on an electric car. His battery-powered tricycle, above, was developed in 1888.

Over in the US, Charles Edgar Duryea was the designer of the first-ever American-made gasoline-powered car. His brother, Frank, built this ground-breaking machine. Charles, the elder of the two, trained as a mechanic and after completing his studies he worked in a bicycle shop in Washington D.C. in the mid-1880s. By the end of the decade he had designed and patented a number of bicycle innovations, including a hammock saddle and, to take the sting out of the rough roads of the day, a variety of frame-mounted spring suspension devices.

He was talent spotted by bicycle maker Harry G. Rouse of Peoria, Illinois and the two went into business together as the Rouse-Duryea Cycle Company. This company – via gun and sword maker Ames Manufacturing of Chicopee, Massachusetts – made the Sylph ‘comfort’ bike for men and women.

An 1892 trade catalogue for the company said:

“Our Mr. C.E. Duryea is well known as one of the most prolific practical cycle inventors in America, and as the originator of number cycling features of great value.”

In 1891, Charles designed a gasoline-powered engine but didn’t progress with it. His brother – who had joined the Rouse-Duryea Cycle Company – carried on working on the engine, and perfected it. In 1893, Charles Duryea made the first trip in an American-made, gasoline-powered ‘automobile.’

By 1896 – while still working in the bicycle trade – Charles and Frank Duryea offered for sale the first commercial automobile in the US, the Duryea Motor Wagon. One of these was bought by Henry Wells of New York.

On May 30th 1896 Wells drove his Duryea Motor Wagon into New York City to take part in a motorcar race organised by Cosmopolitan magazine (then called The Cosmopolitan). While racing on public roads, he crashed into Evelyn Thomas, riding a Columbia bicycle on Broadway near West 74th Street. Wells became the first motorist arrested for what would later become known as dangerous driving.

Thomas had been planning to attend a Civil War Memorial Day service but, instead, was hospitalised with a fractured leg. While in hospital, she was visited by Horatio Earle, the leading light of the League of American Wheelmen, and who was elected to the Michigan Senate in 1900 (It was Earle, a cyclist, who pushed through legislation to create the State Highway Department and who later pushed for the earliest freeways in America).

Thomas related her story to Earle and both agreed that cyclists’ rights on the highway would need protecting from a new menace on the road.

Duryea’s Motor Wagon sold in low numbers (13, in fact, unlucky for some, including Ms Thomas), but a vehicle inspired by the Duryea vehicle would soon sell in its millions. But the Model T wasn’t the first motorcar built by Henry Ford. He called his first vehicle the Quadricycle: it used four bicycle wheels, it was chain driven and it even had a bicycle lamp on the front. All of this is natural enough: Henry Ford was a cyclist and even when he had a car factory he rode his bicycle to work.

Ford promoted his cars by demonstrating how fast they could go. To do this he hired bicycle racing champions, Barney Oldfield and Tom Cooper.

AstonMartinLogoAnother famous car racer was also a cyclist. And, in fact, remained a cyclist. Or, strictly speaking, a tricyclist. Lionel Martin was the co-founder of the famous motor marque Aston Martin, the British sports car driven by 007 James Bond. Martin was a racing cyclist and was the holder of a number of long-distance records, including tandem and tricycle records. He was a tricyclist to his dying day. Literally. He was killed in October 1945 after being knocked from his tricycle by a motorcar on a suburban ‘rat run’ road in Kingston upon Thames. Ironically, he got into motoring after being thrown from his tricycle in 1900 by a waywardly-driven motorcar. “I saw the monster approaching and I threw myself and ‘iron’ into the nearest ditch, counting myself lucky to escape with my life,” he later wrote. He and his business partner Robert Bamford became specialists in taking ordinary cars and ‘souping them up’ to go faster. The Aston Martin name came from a hill climb race at Aston Clinton in Buckinghamshire (close to the modern day Aston mountain bike course in the Wendover woods). Martin drove a modified Singer car very fast up this climb and, when Bamford & Martin Ltd needed a name for their new car brand, they chose to combine the words Aston and Martin. Singer cars were produced by a company that, of course, had started life as a manufacturer of bicycles. George Singer’s bicycle company was one of the earliest, having been founded in Coventry in 1874, and produced high-wheelers at first and Safeties later. George Singer, while still a maker of bicycles, was Mayor of Coventry three years in succession from 1891-1893.

CharlesRolls The Hon. Charles Stewart Rolls – aristocract, playboy, daredevil and co-founder of Rolls Royce – developed his love for speed at Cambridge University, where he won a cycling Half Blue, a university sporting award. Rolls had a collection of bicycles from solos up to four-man tandems. That’s him on the left, on a four-man tandem. I’ve cropped out the other riders and will print the full pic in the book. I’ve licensed the pic from the Science Museum.

In the university newspaper, Rolls gives tips on how to mount a bicycle: “You will first find it necessary to hop two or three times or more till proficient, when one hop should be sufficient.”

KEEP READING, AND WATCHING
In this blog article I’ve just scratched the surface of early motoring’s direct link with cycling. There will be much, much more in the book, available for Kickstarter pre-order right now.

Even if you don’t plan to buy a book, or Kindle or iPad version, do watch the video below. It shows another motoring link with cycling: an 1897 horse, autocar and bicycle repository. This is in my hometown of Newcastle and is a globally-significant example of an extant bicycle/car showroom from such an important cross-over period. In the video I ride an 1890s bicycle in the former Cooper Motor Mart. It’s now an architect’s HQ. Ryder Architects rescued the building and renovated it beautifully.

Posted in 1880s, 1890s, 1900-1905, 1905-1918, Automotive history · 2 Replies ·

Archive

February 17, 2013 by carltonreid

Farewell, my bicycle, I’ve got a motor-car

Send to Kindle

Stanley Show of Cycles, 1896. Cycles, and horseless carriages, too. 12 of them. Two had been displayed at the 1895 Stanley Show, the first time the British public were shown these new contraptions.

Stanley Show of Cycles, 1896. Cycles, and horseless carriages, too. 12 of them. Two had been displayed at the 1895 Stanley Show, the first time the British public were shown these new contraptions.


This poem seems to show that the late Victorian middle-class bicycle boom was well and truly over by 1897. In fact, cycling continued to be a popular form of leisure and transport for some of the moneyed classes through to about 1910. For instance, the composer Edward Elgar didn’t take up cycling until 1900 and explored the Malvern lanes close to his home until 1909, before his wife, finally, made him hang up his Sunbeam in favour of a motorcar.

Nevertheless, the poem demonstrates how, for some, the bicycle was quickly becoming slow and old-fashioned. Pedestrians, previously tormented by cyclists, were now to be tormented by early motorists.

+++++++

My bicycle, my bicycle,
That standest idly by,
With silvered spokes, and plated hubs,
And gear extremely high.
No more shall I a-scorching bend
Above thy handle-bar.
Farewell, farewell, my bicycle,
I’ve got a motor-car.

My bicycle, my bicycle.
By light of sun or lamp
We’ve covered many thousand miles.
We’ve sped through dry and damp;
But never more at dawn or eve
Shall I thy tyres inflate;
The times are changed, my bicycle,
Thou art not up-to-date.

They tempted me, my bicycle.
My swift and silent steed,
With tales about a new machine
That goes at lightning speed;
And still serenely shall I go
Careering through the land,
Though thou art sold, my bicycle,
A bargain, second-hand.

My bicycle, my bicycle,
‘Twill be no longer mine
To chase the flying pedals round,
No more I’ll curve my spine;
But sitting idly at my ease,
I’ll travel with the best,
For I shall turn a handle, and
The car will do the rest.

My bicycle, my bicycle,
It makes me smile with glee
To think how often we have made
The slow pedestrian flee.
With sudden swoop we’ve come full speed
Upon him from afar;
I’ll do the same, my bicycle,
Aboard my motor-car.

Farewell, farewell, my bicycle;
Where flies the wayside dust
I’ll haply chance to pass thee by
(Unless my boilers bust);
For wheresoever on the road
I journey, near or far,
It’s my intent to make things hum
With my new motor-car.

From Hardware Trade Journal
June 1897

By 1902 the Stanley Show of Cycles had been almost wholly taken over by motor vehicles.

By 1902 the Stanley Show of Cycles had been almost wholly taken over by motor vehicles.

The Graphic, 1902

The Graphic, 1902

Posted in 1890s, Automotive history · Leave a Reply ·

Archive

January 25, 2013 by carltonreid

“The motorist nearly always resents delay…”, 1907 motor-car touring advice

Send to Kindle

Back Camera

“There are many excellent guide and road books already in existence, but few of these have been issued since touring in motor-cars has become general, and therefore they often lack the special points which are useful in a new form of travelling…The pedestrian and cyclist often welcome a stop for a moment or two at a point where two roads meet, not only in order to leisurely consult their route book but to rest awhile…The motorist nearly always resents delay. When faced by two roads he sometimes, indeed, prefers to take one at random rather than stop his career even for the brief moment necessary to carefully examine a direction-post or make an enquiry. I do not say that such haste and hurry is in any way admirable, but it must be reckoned with in the guide books of the future.”

Preface from The Road Made Easy with Picture and Pen by Claude Johnson, 1907

Posted in 1905-1918, Automotive history · Leave a Reply ·

Archive

January 14, 2013 by carltonreid

When a Minister for Transport said motorways would get fast-moving traffic off local roads

Send to Kindle

30sspeeding

From my file marked well-that-never-happened-did-it?:

“If Parliament sees fit to grant the necessary powers, it would be my intention to start on a further number of motor roads where that course is found to be preferable to the widening or by-passing of the existing roads. The latter, freed from fast-moving through traffic, would then remain available for pedestrian, cyclist, and local motor traffic, which would use them in greater comfort and security.”

Rt Hon. Alfred Barnes, Minister of Transport, in a statement to the House of Commons, 6th May, 1946

The US opened the first ‘controlled-access highway’ in 1908 (it was a bike path by 1938); Italy opened the first autostrada in 1924; Nazi Germany built the first autobahn in 1932.

Motorways came late to Britain. The first motorway to be opened in the UK was the 8.3 mile long Preston By-pass, opened on the 5th December 1958 by the then Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan.

Why the delay? Not all motorists wanted “special motor roads”.

Writing in 1909, William Joynson-Hicks MP* said:

“I am totally and entirely opposed to taking the motorist and placing him on the heights of fame with a special road to himself, or in the depths of infamy as a being who is not fit to be allowed on the ordinary roads of the country…Once allow us to be put on separate roads and there will be an increasing outcry to keep us to those roads and to forbid us access to the ordinary roads of the country.”

* Joynson-Hicks was chairman of the Motor Union, precursor to the AA, as well as a Conservative MP. He was Minister for Health in 1923-4 and Home Secretary in 1924-29.

Posted in 1905-1918, 1930s, 1940s, American roads, Automotive history · 3 Replies ·

Archive

December 21, 2012 by carltonreid

Chicago aims to be a world-class cycling city (you know, like it was in the 1890s)

Send to Kindle

Thirty miles of protected bike lanes have been opened in Chicago, part of a planned, 645-mile network of joined-up on-street bikeways. This is impressive, but it’s not new. Chicago was once certifiably bicycle-mad. For a few brief years in the 1890s, a bicycle-friendly administration bent over backwards for bicycle riders. The streets were thronged with cyclists and the greater Chicago area was home to an expanding and creative bunch of bicycle manufacturing companies (one of them, founded by a German immigrant, would become America’s biggest bike company by the 1920s). While New York had the world-class Coney Island Cycle Path, from Prospect Park in Brooklyn to the popular resort at Coney Island, Chicago didn’t need cycle-only “side-paths”, it had 40 miles of wide boulevards, which bicyclists had almost to themselves: the well-surfaced boulevards were for “pleasure vehicles” only, horse-drawn wagons were only allowed on dirt roads, and streetcar trolleys were also kept away from the boulevards.

cdotKinzieStreet

In 1898, a year after the middle class “bicycle craze” had burned itself out, the number of cyclists was still on the increase. 10,700 men and women rode bicycles to work in downtown Chicago, double the number that had done so in 1896 at the height of the boom, partly because bicycles started to become cheaper..

Part of the reason for the success of the bicycle in Chicago – then and now – was and is a bicycle-friendly mayor. Today’s Chicago mayor, Rahm Emanuel, building on the foundations of his predecessor Richard Daley, recently unveiled the Chicago’s Streets For Cycling 2020 project. In a foreword to this plan, the mayor wrote:

“Bicycling is an integral part of Chicago’s transportation system. Every day, thousands of people bike on our streets, whether it is to ride to work, to the store, or for recreation…My vision is to make Chicago the most bike-friendly city in the United States…Over the next few years, we will build more protected bike lanes than any other city in the country, redesign intersections to ensure they are safer for bicyclists, and improve hundreds of miles of residential streets for bicyclists, pedestrians, and the people that live on them.”

CarterHarrisonposter200This vision has echoes in the vote-catching bicycle-friendly policies of Carter H. Harrison, Jr., who was elected mayor of Chicago in 1897 on a pro-bicycle ticket. His campaign circulated posters and lapel badges with the slogan ‘Not the Champion Cyclist, but the Cyclists’ Champion.’

Fearsomely organised, mostly middle class, with campaign dollars to spend and thousands of block votes to cast on the most bicycle-friendly candidates, the cyclists of Chicago were a force to be reckoned with. In 1896 the Chicago Times Herald wrote that cyclists were active and persistent lobbyists for smooth surfaces on which to ride:

“The cycling organizations of Chicago…are sending out letters to the various candidates for the legislature…for the purpose of ascertaining their sentiments on the question of Good Roads…Nearly all candidates for office are in favor of good roads nowadays, when the wheelmen constitute such a considerable factor in the voting strength of the cities.”

Harrison shrewdly used the influence and the block vote of the wheelmen to win office. Up against the athletic John M. Harlan, an American footballer, Harrison took to the wheel, racking up a number of century rides and, on campaign posters pasted up all over the city, had himself photographed astride a bicycle with “scorcher handlebars of the scorchiest type.”

“I now had a brilliant thought,” wrote Harrison in his 1930s autobiography:

“…why not utilize my cycling record as an offset to the Harlan football boasting? My brother-in-law, Heaton Owsley, with his twin brother, Harry B., were owners of the St. Nicholas Manufacturing Company, makers of the Hibbard bicycle. I had joined the Century Road Club, was entitled to wear its badge with eighteen pendant bars each engraved with the date of the particular run it represented. It made a brave show. Shortly after the nominations I had the Owsley brothers send a brand-new wheel with scorcher handlebars of the scorchiest type to the Morrison photograph gallery in West Madison Street, rather famous at the time for its photographs of the theatrical world. I then betook myself to the gallery with my riding togs to be photographed head-on, body bend double over the scorcher bars, an attitude that always gave a fiendish expression even to the mildest of faces! What with the rakish cap, the old gray sweater and the string of eighteen pendant bars, I looked like a professional; a picture which I knew would carry weight with the vast army of Chicago wheelmen.”

After winning the election, Mayor Harrison repaid the wheelmen by killing off a streetcar track down the centre of Jackson Street (“Jackson Street Must Be Boulevarded!” petitioned the cyclists, covering the city with yellow ribbons emblazoned with the slogan) and creating a bike path from Edgewater to Evanston along the north-south Sheridan Road. The upscale Edgewater neighbourhood was home to the city’s Saddle and Cycle Club, opened in May 1895, an upper middle class retreat for equestrians and cyclists. The Chicago Tribune counted forty-eight cycling clubs in 1892, with six thousand members. Many of these clubs built and owned their own buildings, some with bicycle valets and indoor gymnasiums. The Old Park Cycling Club spent $50,000 on its headquarters, a tidy sum, all raised from the deep pockets of its members. In 1895 there were less clubs – thirty-three – but four thousand more members than three years previously.

Edith Ogden Harrison, Chicago’s first lady in 1897, would later write approvingly of these pre-automobile days:

“Especially during the lovely summer evenings, before every Astor Street home on our block, one could see the trim bicycles awaiting the cessation of an early dinner for the owners inside the houses, for it was a foregone conclusion that everyone took a ride after dinner in the cool of the evening…Almost at its very appearance, the riders numbered in the hundreds. Schools opened to teach its riding, and the traffic in this really expensive sport became a thing of wonder.”

The New York Evening Post reported that, in 1896, “in Chicago they ride so universally on Sundays that the theatres, which formerly gave successful performances on that day, have discontinued them.”

americatrusschicagoChicago was a bicycling city in more ways than one. In the 1890s, according to the Chicago Journal, the city and environs were home to perhaps as many as eighty-eight bicycle and component manufacturers. The Chicago Bicycle Directory of 1898 claimed that two-thirds of America’s bicycles and accessories were manufactured within 150 miles of the city. Many of the manufacturers clustered around Chicago’s central business district, the Loop, and especially on a stretch of Wabash Avenue that became known as Bicycle Row. One of the firms on Bicycle Row was Hill Cycle Manufacturing, founded in 1893. The company – which built Fowler bicycles – hired a young German immigrant called Ignaz Schwinn. He worked for Hill for two years before leaving in 1895 to co-found Arnold, Schwinn & Co., which, by the 1920s, had grown into America’s leading bike company (its growth was fuelled by buying up the bicycle businesses which failed when bicycle prices fell through the floor in 1898-1899).

chicagoBicycleMap1898
An 1898 bicycle route map of Chicago shows an extensive network of “good cycling roads” (in red) linking in to the Loop and reaching far out into the suburbs.

wabashwide

"The Biggest People on the Road!": PUCK May 1896

Chicago’s 40-miles of wide boulevards were free from streetcar trolleys and “teamster” horse-drawn wagons. The smoothly-surfaced boulevards (so surfaced for cyclists, a bone of contention with non-cyclist rate payers) were for “pleasure vehicles” only. The teamsters were relegated to dirt roads, and the streetcars – seen in the chaotic Edison video below – tended to be on streets other than the boulevards, and in the mid-1890s some ringed the Loop on elevated tracks.

Elevated tracks were mooted for bicycles, too. The League of American Wheelman’s weekly journal of 7th January 1898 reported there were ambitious plans for a scenic lakeside wooden bike path in the sky:

“Plans for the cycleway or elevated bicycle path which Chicago capitalists propose to erect along the north shore shows an ornamental structure which is calculated not to mar the surrounding scenery. The promotors…are of the opinion that the popular demand for such a roadway will overcome the prejudice against elevated structures. It is proposed to build eight miles of road for the first experiment, and the success will determine the extensions. In general the plan is to have the structure sixteen feel above the level of the streets.”

chicagoelevated1899
Such an elevated bike path was built in Los Angeles but I can find no evidence that this proposed one was built in Chicago. By 1898 the middle class bicycle craze was over and wheels were being ridden by workers, who would be unwilling to pay a toll of 10 cents to use fancy aerial bike paths. (Today’s Bloomingdale elevated linear park and trail, running through the heart of Chicago, is a former railway).

A forerunner of the vehicles which would soon kill off cycling in Chicago was housed in a neglected corner of the Transportation Building at Chicago’s 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition, the 600-acre world fair celebrating the 400th anniversary of Columbus’ arrival in the Americas.

WorldsColumbianCover1893
Alongside a great many bicycles and boats – and steam locomotives – there was a little-noticed “gasoline buggy” from Germany, the only internal-combustion vehicle on display at the fair. Newspaper reporters largely ignored the 1889 Daimler “horseless carriage” and it didn’t even get its own entry in the exhibition catalogue. Two out-of-town visitors to the expo who did notice the primitive motorcar would go on to reshape America. One was the bicycle mechanic Charles Duryea and the other was Detroit’s most famous cyclist, Henry Ford. In September 1893 Duryea built America’s first home-grown automobile, and three years later Ford would build his petroleum-powered Quadricycle. Within 20 years of these two cyclists visiting the Columbian Exposition, one of them had succeeded in taking automobiles to a mass audience and they had displaced bicycles from Chicago, and from other American cities.

Now, the bicycle is making a comeback and Chicago is leading the way. Again.

Posted in 1890s, 1900-1905, American roads, Automotive history, Bicycle shops, League of American Wheelmen · 3 Replies ·

Archive

December 12, 2012 by carltonreid

MOTOROBESITY, Punch magazine, 1902

Send to Kindle

A FORECAST

In the spring of 1913 St. John Skinner came back from Africa, after spending nine or ten years somewhere near the Zambesi. He travelled up to Waterloo by the electric train, and the three very stout men who were in the same first-class compartment seemed to look at him with surprise. On arriving at his hotel he pushed his way through a crowd of fat persons in the hall. Then he changed his clothes, and went round to his Club to dine. The dining-room was filled with members of extraordinary obesity, all eating heartily. In the fat features of one of them he thought he recognised a once familiar face.


“Round,” said he, “how are you?” The stout man stopped eating, and gazed at him anxiously. “Why,” he murmured, after a while, in the soft voice that comes from folds of fat, “it must be Skinner. My dear fellow, what is the matter with you? Have you had a fever?”

“I’m all right,” answered the other “what makes you think I’ve been ill?”

“Ill, man,” said Round, “why you’ve wasted away to nothing. You’re a perfect skeleton.”

“If it’s a question of bulk,” remarked Skinner, “I’m much more surprised. You’ve grown so stout, every fellow in the Club seems so stout, everyone I’ve seen is as fat as you are.”

“Heavens,” exclaimed Round, “you don’t mean to say I’ve been putting on more flesh? I’m the lightweight of the Club. I only weigh sixteen stone. No, no, you’re chaffing, or you judge by your own figure.”

“Not a bit,” said the other; “perhaps you’re right. It’s very much what the doctors say. It’s the fashionable complaint, motorobesity. Sit down, and dine with me, and I’ll tell you what the idea is. You see, it’s like this. For ten years or so everybody who could afford a motor of some sort has had one. We’ve all had one. Not to have a motor has been simply ridiculous, if not disreputable. So everybody has ridden about all day in the fresh air, never had any exercise, and got an enormous appetite…

“I suppose everyone is really getting fat. One notices it when one does happen to see a thin fellow like you. Why, in all the Clubs they’ve had to have new arm-chairs, because the old ones were too narrow.”

Posted in 1900-1905, 1905-1918, Automotive history · 3 Replies ·

Archive

December 12, 2012 by carltonreid

Quirky 1835 law means bicycles can’t be ridden on pavements but police tend not to nab cars which park on pavements

Send to Kindle

It’s ironic, but the law that states cyclists shouldn’t ride on pavements is the same law that could be used to prevent motorists from parking on pavements. Which is the greater social ill? If you believe vitriolic letters in local and national newspapers you would think it’s the former. Parking on infrastructure meant for pedestrians, two wheels or more over the kerb, is now so endemic it’s perceived to be perfectly normal and therefore correct.

Those who rant at cyclists for pavement riding tend not to rant at motorists committing the exact some offence. The offence was introduced in 1835. While all other parts of the 1835 Highway Act have been either amended or repealed, clause 72 remains in force. It’s a juicy one:

“If any person shall wilfully ride upon any footpath or causeway by the side of any road made or set apart for the use or accommodation of foot passengers; or shall wilfully lead or drive any horse, ass, sheep, mule, swine, or cattle or carriage of any description, or any truck or sledge, upon any such footpath or causeway; or shall tether any horse, ass, mule, swine, or cattle, on any highway, so as to suffer or permit the tethered animal to be thereon.”

The key phrase is “carriage of any description”. That is a cover-all that is still in force. Motor cars were classed as carriages in the 1903 Motor Car Act; bicycles were so classified in 1888. The operators of bicycles and cars have the same road rights, that is, being able to pass and repass over the public highway. Stopping for any length of time is a grey area, with a mishmash of laws, and parking of a carriage is also caught up in a swirl of conflicting legislation.

However, clause 72 of the 1835 Highway Act is clear: carriages must not “ride upon any footpath or causeway by the side of any road.”

The 1835 act didn’t mention bicycles (pedal propelled bikes weren’t developed until the late 1860s) and so, at first, bicycles had no legal status, no legal right to be on either roads or footpaths. Since its foundation in 1878, the Cyclists’ Touring Club has fought tooth and nail to secure highway rights for cyclists.

The CTC was founded to:

“secure a fair and equitable administration of Justice as regards the right of bicyclists to the public roads. To watch the course of any legislative proposals in Parliament or elsewhere affecting the interests of the bicycling public, and to make such representations on the subject as the occasion may demand.”

The council of the CTC wanted cyclists to be seen as responsible citizens and it invoked the “golden rule”, the do-unto-others prescription:

“[We] specially urge on every individual rider the desirability of extending to all that courtesy which be would have shown to himself. The present prejudice against bicycling has been partly caused (and cannot but be fostered and increased) by a disregard to the feelings of other passengers on the road; and although the right of the bicyclist to the free use of the public highway should be at all times maintained, any needless altercation should be studiously avoided.”

Cyclists were the newest user of the public highway and could easily be banned, nationally as well as locally.

In 1878, the year when the CTC was founded, the case of Taylor v. Goodwin was pivotal. Mr. Justice Mellor and Mr. Justice Lush, sitting in banco in the Queen’s Bench Division, held that bicyclists were liable to the pains and penalties imposed by the 1835 Highway Act.

The case had been brought against a Mr Taylor who had been charged for “riding furiously” down Muswell Hill in London, knocking down a pedestrian in the process. His defence argued that as a bicycle wasn’t defined as a carriage in the 1835 Act there was no case to answer. The plea was disregarded and Taylor was fined. The case was appealed and justices Mellor and Lush ruled that bicycles were henceforth to be considered carriages under the law.

This was bad for Taylor, good for cyclists in general. It meant bicycles, for the first time, had a legal status. Described as carriages, they had full legal rights to pass and repass along highways (and highways are not just ‘roads’, they’re carriageways, footpaths, bridleways, everything).

The legal definition of bicycles as legitimate highway users was further strengthened in 1888. The Local Government Bill of this year created County Councils. The Cyclists’ Touring Club formed a committee to oversee the progress of this bill through Parliament. It was feared that if County Councils were given powers to create their own bye-laws such bye-laws would be used to prohibit bicycles. The CTC had political clout: it asked one of its members – who just so happened to be an MP – to lodge an amendment to the Bill. Sir John Donnington “won a brilliant victory for the Club,” wrote James Lightwood, the author of a 1928 history of the CTC.

When the Act – with the critical amendment – was duly passed, a writer in the Law Journal said the Local Government Act of 1888 was the “Magna Carta de Bicyclis.”

Lightwood said:

“As a result there disappeared…every enactment which gave to Courts of Sessions, Municipal Corporations and similar bodies in England and Wales power to resist and hamper the movements of cyclists as they might think fit. The new order of things established once and for all the status of the cycle.”


The status of a bicycle as a “carriage” is an important legal one but the terminology did not follow through to popular use, as shown by the words of Henry Dacre’s music hall song Daisy Bell which emphasises that carriages and bicycles are two different things:

It won’t be a stylish marriage,
I can’t afford a carriage,
But you’ll look sweet upon the seat
Of a bicycle made for two.

Nevertheless, the legal definition of bicycles as carriages allowed cycling to prosper. Without a clearly defined and nationwide legal status, it would have been easier for localities to ban the use of bicycles.

Section 72 Highways Act 1835 is used in the current Highway Code. Rule 145 states:

“You MUST NOT drive on or over a pavement, footpath or bridleway except to gain lawful access to property, or in the case of an emergency.”

Since January 1999 a fixed penalty notice can be issued with the offender given a ticket with fine and points attached unless they appeal in which case it goes to court.

This regulation tends not to be used, especially if a police officer doesn’t see the driver actually driving on to the pavement. A police officer may have “reasonable grounds” to believe the motorist drove on the pavement – it would be up to the courts to decide whether a driver was telling the truth should he claim his car was placed on the pavement with the use of a crane. However, unlike for a speeding offence a police officer has no power, in relation to driving on the pavement, to insist that the keeper of a vehicle tells of who was driving at any particular time. This particular quirk of the law could be remedied by politicians in an instant, but MPs – despite many promises – have over the years repeatedly failed to give the police this simple expedient. For this and other reasons the police generally don’t enforce this particular law and tend to refer complainants to local authority parking enforcement officers, who have few mechanisms in which to tackle the problem.

Now, back to that crane. If there was one knocking around the police officer should use it to lift cars off the pavement, ship them off to the pound and charge motorists for the process. Then perhaps our pavements could be freed of private property obstructing the public highway. But don’t stand still: highways, such as pavements, are there for passage, to be used to pass and repass, and obstruction of the highway is an offence. An offence only ever rarely enforced, of course, which is why motorists feel free to dump their motor vehicles on the carriageway.

Posted in 1830s, Automotive history, CTC history, Road rights · 7 Replies ·

Archive

November 30, 2012 by carltonreid

Parking private property on the street is a modern malaise (and not done in Japan)

Send to Kindle

In last week’s Sunday Times, the newspaper’s ‘motormouth’ correspondent Mike Rutherford wrote:

“Parking is now officially, in my book at least, one of the undisputed rip-offs of the decade.” He claims he will no longer pay for “heinously expensive spaces” and will be “refusing to drive or visit town centres and using out-of-town shopping centres instead.”

Rutherford, like many motorists, believes private property (cars) should be allowed to be stored on public infrastructure (roads) paid for not by motorists but by all tax payers. Many of those who live beside roads believe they have the absolute right to park outside their front door, even though such rights rarely exist.

This belief in the unalienable right to park, for free, anywhere where there’s not a double yellow line or a pay car park, is a strong one. And it’s relatively new.

Up until the 1920s, few people had cars and those that were owned were usually accommodated off the public highway when not in use. Cars were stabled, just as horses had been done before the advent of the ‘horseless carriage’.

bentonbridgeparking

Now it’s difficult to get moved on many urban roads because they’re narrowed by parked cars, very often illegally parked cars, with two wheels on the part of the highway meant for pedestrians.

Such storage of private property on the public highway would have been unthinkable to previous generations, as was pointed by the brilliant economist Ralph Turvey – a professor at the LSE and economist for the World Bank and other organisations – in his classic treatise ‘Street Mud, Dust and Noise’ (London Journal 21, 1996).

Professor Turvey wrote:

“In the nineteenth century the streets were clear from kerb to kerb for the sweepers, water carts and broom machines to do their work in the small hours. Horses and carts or carriages were not left in the street at night, and when – a rare occurrence – unhorsed cabs were left all night on carriageways, the offenders were fined. Victorian London may have been smelly, dusty and muddy, but it had no parking problem.”

Bit by bit we have allowed private property to be dumped in public spaces, and most people don’t give this a second’s thought.

And it doesn’t have to be this way. In Japan, in order to own a car, you must prove that you have a off-street parking space. This parking certificate is called shako shoumei, named for the Shako Law, in force since 1958.

In the UK no such proof is required. We endure clogged streets, dangerous for pedestrians, cyclists and motorists, but this is seen as normal. It wasn’t normal in the past and it’s not normal in every other car-saturated nation.

With less parked cars blocking roads (and pavements), our towns and cities would be better places to live.

Posted in 1890s, Automotive history, Pedestrianisation, Road rights · 4 Replies ·
← Older posts

About the book

  • Book info
  • Kickstarter information
  • Privacy & T/Cs

Thanks to

Brompton

Free PDF tx to:

Tern

Recent posts

  • US senator: “[Automobiles are the future but] I cannot conceive our active Americans in carriages moved by any other motor but the horse”
  • Reallocation of roadspace: here’s how Birmingham’s Victoria Square did it
  • A gamble or a sure thing? Here’s how to succeed with Kickstarter (& don’t forget the deductions)
  • Cities are not set in stone, stone can be moved
  • Road users should “take care owing to the children who make the road their playground”

Recent Comments

  • Mark Calvin on Detroit’s most famous cyclist: Henry Ford
  • carltonreid on The sad tale of a cycle network innovator forgotten by the New Town he built
  • rich257 on The sad tale of a cycle network innovator forgotten by the New Town he built
  • Anonymous on A gamble or a sure thing? Here’s how to succeed with Kickstarter (& don’t forget the deductions)
  • Minnie Rodriguez on A gamble or a sure thing? Here’s how to succeed with Kickstarter (& don’t forget the deductions)

Thanks to

Chain Reaction Cycles dot com

Blogroll

  • Chartered Institution of Highways & Transportation
  • CTC – sticking up for cyclists since 1878
  • Cycling Embassy of GB – sticking up for cyclists since 2011
  • How We Drive
  • iPayRoadTax.com
  • Joe Moran's Blog
  • League of American Cyclists – sticking up for cyclists since 1880
  • Rees Jeffreys Road Fund
  • Road.cc
  • Wheelmen

Thanks to

Chain Reaction Cycles dot com

Book free due to:

cycleclaims

Archives

Categories

Pages

  • Book info
  • Kickstarter information
  • Privacy & T/Cs

Contact

CARLTON REID
carltonreid@mac.com
LinkedIn
Twitter
Tel: +44 191 265 2062

Clicky-flicky pitch

You can learn more about this e-book in the 8-page pitch on issuu.com. If you're accessing this site from an iPad, click on the iPad-specific link instead.

Book free due to:

Tern
ChainReactionCycles

All content © 2013 by Roads Were Not Built For Cars. WordPress Themes by Graph Paper Press